Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 22(1): 41-44, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2206360

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oily skin is one of the most common dermatological complaints. With the obligation to use masks to protect themselves from the Covid-19 virus, the problem has become even more evident. One of the treatments proposed is the use of onabotulinumtoxin-A injected sub-dermally. For an optimal result, the injections must be done on the whole area with numerous micro-injections located only in the sub-dermis. The procedure is often poorly tolerated by patients and sometimes accompanied by hematomas and bruises. This research aimed to test a disposable device to inject botulin toxin at 1.5 mm under the skin with a painless procedure and homogeneous distribution of the toxin. METHODS: We treated patients with oily skin with the injection of 100 IU of Onabotulinumtoxin-A (diluted in 5 ml of a saline solution). All the patients were evaluated after 2 weeks, one month, and three months. RESULTS: In 10 patients, after 15 days we observed a real improvement of the quality of the skin; for two, the results were present at the 1 month follow up. In all cases, the treatment appeared homogeneous in the entire face. All the patients considered the procedure virtually painless or with minimal discomfort. CONCLUSION: In accordance with other authors, we confirm the real advantages of micro-botulinum toxin for oily skin. Moreover, the use of this simple and innovative device allows a homogeneous distribution of the drug in the correct plane, without pain, and reduces the risks of common complications. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;21(1): doi:10.36849/JDD.6900.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Seborrheic , Neuromuscular Agents , Humans , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dermatitis, Seborrheic/drug therapy , Skin , Pain/chemically induced , Neuromuscular Agents/adverse effects
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(15)2022 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1957353

ABSTRACT

Usefulness of Vaccine-Adverse Event-Reporting System (VAERS) data and protocols required for statistical analyses were pinpointed with a set of recommendations for the application of machine learning modeling or exploratory analyses on VAERS data with a case study of COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Janssen). A total of 262,454 duplicate reports (29%) from 905,976 reports were identified, which were merged into a total of 643,522 distinct reports. A customized online survey was also conducted providing 211 reports. A total of 20 highest reported adverse events were first identified. Differences in results after applying various machine learning algorithms (association rule mining, self-organizing maps, hierarchical clustering, bipartite graphs) on VAERS data were noticed. Moderna reports showed injection-site-related AEs of higher frequencies by 15.2%, consistent with the online survey (12% higher reporting rate for pain in the muscle for Moderna compared to Pfizer-BioNTech). AEs {headache, pyrexia, fatigue, chills, pain, dizziness} constituted >50% of the total reports. Chest pain in male children reports was 295% higher than in female children reports. Penicillin and sulfa were of the highest frequencies (22%, and 19%, respectively). Analysis of uncleaned VAERS data demonstrated major differences from the above (7% variations). Spelling/grammatical mistakes in allergies were discovered (e.g., ~14% reports with incorrect spellings for penicillin).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Child , Female , Humans , Machine Learning , Male , Pain/chemically induced , Penicillins , United States , Vaccines/adverse effects
3.
Front Immunol ; 13: 855311, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1924091

ABSTRACT

Background: This study aimed at assessing the safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with thyroid cancer. Methods: This observational study included thyroid cancer patients between April 1, 2021, and November 31, 2021, in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. All participants received at least one dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 IgG was tested, and the interval time between the last dose and humoral response test ranged from <1 to 8 months. The complications after SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were recorded. Results: A total of 115 participants at least received one dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines with a 67.0% IgG-positive rate. Among them, 98 cases had completed vaccination, and the positivity of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was 96% (24/25) with three doses of ZF2001. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies' positivity was 63.0% (46/73) of two doses of CoronaVac or BBIBP-CorV vaccine. Additionally, after 4 months of the last-dose vaccination, the IgG-positive rate (31.6%, 6/19) significantly decreased in thyroid cancer patients. The IgG-positive rate (81.0%, 64/79) was satisfactory within 3 months of the last-dose vaccination. Ten (10.2%) patients had side effects after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Among them, two (2.0%) patients had a fever, five (5.1%) patients had injection site pain, one (1.0%) patient felt dizzy, and one patient felt dizzy and had injection site pain at the same time. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (CoronaVac, BBIBP-CorV, and ZF2001) are safe in thyroid cancer patients. The regression time of SARS-CoV-2 IgG is significantly shorter in thyroid cancer patients than in healthy adults. Therefore, a booster vaccination dose may be earlier than the systematic strategy for thyroid cancer patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thyroid Neoplasms , Viral Vaccines , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Pain/chemically induced , Recombinant Proteins , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Transplant Proc ; 53(8): 2630-2635, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1386693

ABSTRACT

Calcineurin-inhibitor induced pain syndrome (CIPS) also called the "symmetrical bone syndrome" is a condition describing reversible lower extremity pain in patients after organ transplantation who are receiving calcineurin inhibitors, especially tacrolimus. We present a case of CIPS after orthotopic heart transplant complicated with concurrent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We emphasize the presentation; diagnostic evaluation, and findings. We then discuss the proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms of CIPS and conclude with discussion of management strategies. Additionally, we present a table to guide clinicians in assessing posttransplant bone pain syndromes. To our knowledge, this is the first article to describe a case of CIPS with concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Calcineurin Inhibitors , Heart Transplantation , Pain/chemically induced , COVID-19/complications , Calcineurin , Calcineurin Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL